CalQuity
Credit

Filing in. Credit memo out.

Drop a filing. CalQuity spreads the financials, computes the ratios, flags the risks, and drafts the memo — every number cited to the page. Then it watches covenant headroom across the book.

Single-tenant or VPCCited to the pageNo training on your data
CalQuity · Credit AnalysisAwaiting filing

Drop quarterly or annual reports

PDF · multi-period supported

PDF
1Upload
2Parse
3Dashboard

A full credit memo — assembled, cited, ready to sign.

Credit red flags

Underwriting issues the filing does not headline.

Triangulated across statements, footnotes, covenants, and prior periods — so the memo surfaces credit-relevant deterioration early.

Liquidity
Watch
Covenants
Tight
Cash flow
Weak
  • highDSCR headroom below 12%EBITDA cushion compressed after add-back normalization.
  • highOCF trails EBITDA for 3 periodsCash conversion weakens despite reported margin expansion.
  • medNet leverage up 0.7x YoYDebt growth outpaces run-rate EBITDA and cash balance.
  • medAR days +18 vs borrower planWorking-capital drag explains most of the liquidity decline.
  • lowCustomer concentration disclosure movedTop-customer dependency appears only in footnote changes.
Evidence bundle

Each flag links back to the ratio formula, covenant clause, source page, and period-over-period bridge.

8 ratios

Computed with formulas and interpretation.

D/EICCurrentQuickND/EBITDAROEEBITDA %NPM
Source citations

Every number opens the PDF at the exact page.

4.72x p.6Opens PDF
Multi-period

Drop Q1 · Q2 · Q3 together. One memo, side-by-side columns.

Q1 FY26
9,386
Q2 FY26
10,560
Q3 FY26
10,328
Q4 FY26
11,142
Word export

Committee-ready memo, one click.

  • Officer assessment
  • Ratios w/ interpretations
  • Red flags + evidence
  • Letterhead, page numbers
Charts

Revenue, margin, segment mix — auto-built.

Canvas

Source PDFs filed under the memo. Reopen anytime.

Ask the memo
Acme Corp · FY26
Run a scenario analysis on Acme Corp assuming a 10% increase in raw material prices.
Refine the scenario or ask a follow-up…Send

Stress-test it in plain English.

Shock raw-material prices, FX, or rates. Refine the question mid-thread. Every output stays anchored to the filing it came from.

"Run scenario analysis assuming a 10% rise in raw-material prices."
"Refine — show me 20% and 30% shocks side by side."
"Which covenant breaks first?"

Connected

Whatever you have, it connects.

Point CalQuity at the filings, the financials, the credit agreement, even your own prior memos. Any format goes in; cited, committee-ready output comes back.

CalQuity · Connect
Live

Your data · any format

Filings & financials

Annual filings
Quarterlies
Audited statements
MD&A & footnotes
Excel models
Tax & filings

Debt documents

Credit agreements
Indentures
Covenant schedules
Term sheets
Security & collateral
Compliance certs

Your book

Borrower files
Prior memos
Rating models
Watchlist
PDFXLSXHTMLXBRLDOCXscans+ anything else
CalQuity
Enginedecompose · retrieve · reason · cite

Sample outputs

Credit memoyour house format
Ratio dashboardevery figure cited
Red flagswith the page
Covenant headroomtracked to the clause
Borrower profileone-pager

Then it watches the whole book.

A credit decision is the start, not the end. The same engine tracks covenant headroom to the clause and re-scores every name as the next statement posts — so a breach is a flag the morning it files, not a surprise at the quarterly review.

  • Covenant headroom measured against the agreement
  • Breach and early-warning alerts as filings land
  • Watchlist names re-scored automatically
CalQuity · Monitor
Live

Portfolio surveillance · tightest covenant

Q3 FY26
Northwind Mfg.In compliance
Net debt / EBITDA ≤ 4.0×

3.1× · 0.9× of room

Cedar FoodsWatch
Interest coverage ≥ 2.5×

2.8× · tightening 2 qtrs

Atlas LogisticsBreach
Min. liquidity $50m

$41m · below floor

Vertex HealthIn compliance
Leverage ≤ 5.5×

4.0× · ample

Atlas Logistics breached the liquidity floor. Flagged the morning the quarterly results filing posted. Credit agreement §6.2

Borrower material never leaves.

Credit files carry confidential borrower data and, on private deals, MNPI. CalQuity runs where that data already lives — single-tenant, in your VPC, and more — with entitlements enforced at retrieval and an audit trail on every figure and export.

  • Deal teams see only their files — entitlements enforced at retrieval
  • Every retrieval, draft, and export logged
  • Nothing trains a shared model
Your environment
Flexible deploymentVPC · single-tenant · more
Encrypted in transitTLS 1.3
Never trained onYour data

Your data stays yours — it never leaves your perimeter

Use cases

Every job on the credit desk, in one place.

The concrete tasks credit teams run — from underwriting a new facility to watching the book once it is on.

Spread the financials

Three statements normalised from the filing — every line tied to its page.

Ratios, interpreted

Leverage, coverage, liquidity computed with the read, not just the number.

Forensic red flags

Revenue-recognition, working-capital, and coverage pressure surfaced early.

Debt-document review

Covenants, baskets, and carve-outs pulled from the credit agreement.

Credit memo drafting

A first draft in your house format, every figure linked to source.

Peer benchmarking

Compare the borrower against rated peers and the sector.

Covenant sizing

Set headroom at origination against the projection case.

Scenario stress-test

Shock rates, FX, or input costs in plain English — which covenant breaks first.

Rating & scorecard inputs

Populate the internal scorecard with cited, defensible figures.

Outcomes

Built to stand up in committee.

Faster to a defensible memo — and every figure traces to the page it came from.

0%

less time to a first-pass credit memo

0×

more names monitored per analyst

0%

of figures cited to source

0

of your filings leave the perimeter

See it on your borrower

Run CalQuity on a live filing.

Bring a borrower you are reviewing. We will spread it, draft the memo, and cite every figure — nothing leaving your perimeter.

CalQuity · Credit

AskWhat is net leverage, and is it inside the covenant?

Net debt / EBITDA was 3.1×1 at FY24 — inside the 4.0× maintenance covenant, with 0.9× of headroom.

Source [1]

FY2024 Annual Report, p.63 · Net debt $1,240m / EBITDA $400m; covenant per Credit Agreement §6.2.

Cited to source